Written: 2nd December 2024
Intra Company Transfer Visa Checklist
235KB
Article Written By: Charl Vollmer
Written: 2nd December 2024
This article has been fact checked.
With 12 years of experience, Charl Vollmer is a trusted guide for those seeking to immigrate to South Africa.
The Intra-Company Transfer Work Visa (ICT visa) is issued under Section 19(5) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 and is a temporary residence visa. It allows a foreign national to work in a South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate of their existing employer for a maximum of 4 years. The ICT visa cannot be renewed inside South Africa, does not require a Department of Labour certificate, and does not automatically lead to permanent residence. The post-ICT pathway must be planned before the visa expires — not after.
Migrate With Q is a professional immigration consultancy that assists individuals with the Intra-Company Transfer Visa application process.
The Intra-Company Transfer Work Visa (ICT visa) is a category-specific temporary work authorisation issued under Section 19(5) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. It applies exclusively to existing employees being transferred within a defined corporate group — not to new appointments, local hires, or independent contractors. The foreign national must already hold a contract of employment with the company abroad, and the South African entity must be a branch, subsidiary, or affiliate of that foreign company. An employee hired directly into a South African role, even by a multinational, does not qualify for this category.
Section 19(5) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 authorises the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) to issue a work visa to a foreign national being transferred to a South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate of their overseas employer. The Act places specific obligations on the South African employer, including a financial guarantee for deportation costs and a commitment to skills transfer. Regulation 18(8)–(11) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018) sets out the documentary and compliance requirements that implement Section 19(5) in practice.
A branch is the same legal entity as the foreign company, operating in South Africa without separate incorporation. A subsidiary is a South African-registered entity in which the foreign company holds a controlling interest — typically a majority shareholding. An affiliate is a related entity connected through common ownership or control, without a direct parent-subsidiary relationship. All three qualify for the ICT visa. A recently incorporated South African entity is a common edge case: the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) will scrutinise whether the entity is operational and genuinely connected to the foreign company, not merely a shell registration through CIPC (Companies and Intellectual Property Commission).
You qualify if you have been employed by the foreign entity for at least 6 months under a formal employment contract and are being transferred to a South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate in the same or a related role. The transfer must be genuine — an organisational move within the corporate group, not a new appointment structured to appear as a transfer. Directors, shareholders, and freelance contractors face specific restrictions that can disqualify them from this category.
Under Regulation 18(8)(a) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018), the core eligibility conditions are:
Common disqualifying factors include a contract of less than 6 months’ duration, inability to prove the corporate relationship between the foreign entity and the South African entity, and being appointed directly into a South African role without prior employment with the foreign company.
Regulation 18(8)(a) requires “the foreigner’s contract of employment with the company abroad to be valid for a period of not less than six months”. This refers to the contract duration, not actual days physically present in the country. A contract signed 6 months before the application date — even where the employee was on leave, secondment, or another project — satisfies the requirement provided the contract was continuously valid. A series of short-term contracts does not automatically aggregate to 6 months unless they form a continuous employment relationship without gaps.
A director who is also an employee under a qualifying employment contract may qualify — the directorship alone is insufficient. A shareholder without an employment contract does not qualify; ownership is not employment. A freelance contractor does not qualify: the ICT visa requires an employment relationship, not a service agreement. DHA assesses the substance of the relationship, not its label. If the arrangement is structured as employment for visa purposes but operates as a consultancy, DHA may refuse on the basis that no genuine intragroup transfer exists.
DHA assesses whether the South African entity is a genuine operational branch or affiliate of the foreign company — not merely a recently formed shell. CIPC (Companies and Intellectual Property Commission) registration is a threshold requirement, but registration alone is not sufficient. DHA looks for evidence of actual business operations: lease agreements, tax registration with SARS, bank accounts, and documented commercial activity. An entity incorporated specifically for the purpose of facilitating the visa, with no trading history, faces a high refusal risk.
The ICT visa application requires proof of the corporate relationship, a skills transfer plan, and a deportation cost undertaking signed by the South African employer. No SAQA evaluation of foreign qualifications is required for this visa category. Employer obligations under Regulations 18(9) and 18(11) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018) are statutory — not discretionary HR commitments. Failure to provide any mandatory employer document results in application refusal.
The following documents are required under Form 8 (DHA-1738) and Regulation 18(8) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018):
Applicant Documents:
Employer Obligations (South African Entity):
Regulation 18(9)(c) requires “a plan developed for the transfer of skills to a South African citizen or permanent resident. ” DHA does not prescribe a standard format, but the plan must be substantive — not a single paragraph of intent. In practice, DHA expects identification of the South African national(s) who will receive the skills transfer, a description of the skills or knowledge to be transferred, a timeline aligned to the visa period, and measurable outcomes or milestones. A vague document that states the employer “intends to transfer skills” without naming individuals or methods will not satisfy the requirement. This plan also connects directly to the Trusted Employer Scheme (TES) criteria – addressed below under employer compliance.
Regulation 18(11) places a direct financial obligation on the South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate: it must “undertake to reimburse the Department any costs incurred in relation to the deportation of the holder of an intra-company transfer work visa and any of his or her dependant family members.” This is not a formality. The South African entity is accepting personal liability for the full cost of DHA’s deportation process — flights, detention, escort, and associated administrative costs — for the employee and all accompanying dependants. If the entity is thinly capitalised, recently incorporated, or in financial difficulty, this undertaking exposes the organisation to a real enforcement risk. Legal counsel should review this document before it is signed.
DHA verifies that the South African entity is a registered, operational company through CIPC (Companies and Intellectual Property Commission). Full particulars of the employer must be included in the application. DHA also checks SARS compliance: an entity in tax default or under SARS enforcement action creates grounds for refusal. A company in good standing with both CIPC and SARS signals that the transfer is into a legitimate and stable entity — not a vehicle created solely to facilitate the visa.
Complete our Assessment form
We discuss your visa needs!
Get a personalized visa quote
Initiate the process by making payment
Our experts handle your visa application
ICT visa applications must be lodged outside South Africa — at a VFS Global centre or DIRCO mission in the applicant’s country of residence. The prescribed form is Form 8 (DHA-1738). There is no in-country application route for this category. Applications submitted from inside South Africa will not be accepted.
VFS Global operates dedicated application centres in most major cities worldwide and handles the administrative lodgement and biometric collection on behalf of DHA. DIRCO missions (South African embassies, high commissions, and consulates) process applications directly where no VFS centre exists. VFS availability varies significantly by country — some markets have multiple centres, others have none. Where VFS is available, it is the standard lodgement route. DIRCO missions are the fallback in countries without VFS coverage. Processing times at both channels are variable and cannot be guaranteed. Plan for a minimum of 8 weeks from lodgement to decision as a working assumption, not a commitment.
The Immigration Act 13 of 2002 does not prescribe a mandatory processing timeframe for ICT visa applications. DHA’s internal service standard targets are not consistently published or met. In practice, applications lodged at VFS Global centres in major markets take 8 to 16 weeks from submission to decision as a working range. Complex applications — those with corporate relationship queries or incomplete employer undertakings — routinely exceed this range. Applicants should not make travel arrangements, resign from their current role, or commit to a start date in South Africa until the visa is physically in hand.
Applications for the ICT visa submitted from inside South Africa will not be accepted. DHA will reject or decline to process the application at the lodgement stage — before it reaches a merits assessment. The legal requirement is that the application be lodged through the correct overseas channel: a VFS Global centre or DIRCO mission in the applicant’s country of residence. A foreign national already onshore on a different visa who requires an ICT visa must depart South Africa and apply from abroad. Attempting to lodge locally — regardless of the current visa held — will not produce an ICT visa and will waste time, money, and documents already prepared.
The Intra-Company Transfer Work Visa (ICT visa) is valid for a maximum of 4 years and cannot be renewed in South Africa. Under Regulation 18(10) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018), the visa is “issued for a period not exceeding four years and is not renewable”. The holder is restricted to the employer and role specified at the application. Role changes, employer restructures, and secondary income all carry direct legal consequences for visa validity.
The following conditions trigger visa invalidity or legal exposure:
No. Regulation 18(10) is explicit: the ICT visa “is not renewable”. DHA does not provide an extension mechanism for this category. When the visa period expires, the holder must depart South Africa unless a different visa — applied for in the correct manner and timeframe — is already in place. Post-ICT planning must begin at least 12 months before the expiry date.
Regulation 18(9)(a) restricts the holder to employment only in “the specific position for which the visa has been issued”. A significant change in role — including a promotion, a change in job title, a change in reporting structure, or a material change in duties — may constitute a breach of visa conditions, even if the salary and employer remain the same. The consequence is that the holder becomes in breach of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, which may render them an illegal foreigner under Section 1 of the act. The employer’s failure to notify DHA of the change compounds the exposure. Where a role change is unavoidable, specialist immigration advice must be obtained before the change takes effect.
A corporate acquisition, merger, or restructure that changes the legal identity of the South African employer creates a compliance risk for the ICT visa holder. The visa is issued to a specific individual for a specific position with a specific entity. Where the employer entity ceases to exist or changes substantially, the conditions of the visa may no longer be satisfied. The holder and their employer must seek specialist immigration advice immediately. Where the employer enters business rescue or liquidation, the deportation undertaking under Regulation 18(11) becomes a live obligation.
No. The ICT visa restricts the holder to employment in the specific position authorised by the visa. Taking secondary income from any other South African employer — including through a directorship, consultancy, or part-time role — constitutes employment outside the authorised position and breaches visa conditions. Serving as a non-executive director of a separate South African company carries the same risk if any remuneration is received. Unpaid non-executive roles are a grey area that requires specific legal assessment.
No. The Accompanying Dependant Visa does not confer the right to work in South Africa. A spouse or dependant accompanying an ICT visa holder on an accompanying dependant visa is prohibited from taking up employment, running a business, or generating income from a South African source. This is not a discretionary restriction — it is a condition of the visa category. If the accompanying spouse or dependant wishes to be employed in South Africa, they must apply for their own work visa independently of the ICT holder. The relevant categories to consider are the General Work Visa (assessed under the points-based system introduced by Government Notice 5448 of 18 October 2024) or the Critical Skills Work Visa (for occupations on the published critical skills list). Planning for a spouse’s employment must start before arrival — not after.
The ICT visa suits single intragroup transfers with a defined end date or exit strategy. The Corporate Visa suits companies moving multiple foreign employees into South Africa under a single authorisation. The General Work Visa suits independent appointments, direct hires, or applicants with long-term settlement intent. Choosing the wrong route risks application refusal, wasted compliance costs, and compromised legal status for the employee.
Attribute | ICT Work Visa | General Work Visa | Corporate Visa |
Legal basis | Section 19(5), Immigration Act 13 of 2002 | Section 19(2), Immigration Act 13 of 2002 | Section 21, Immigration Act 13 of 2002 |
Eligibility base | Existing employee of foreign entity, intragroup transfer | Foreign national with confirmed job offer, points-based assessment | Corporate employer with approved corporate visa; multiple workers |
DOL certificate required | No | No — replaced by points-based system (GN 5448, Oct 2024) | No |
Maximum duration | 4 years | 5 years | As per corporate visa approval |
Renewable | No | Yes | Workers issued certificates under the corporate visa |
PR pathway | Does not count toward PR under Section 26(a) | Counts toward 5-year work visa PR under Section 26(a) | It depends on individual worker’s status |
Best-fit scenario | Defined-term secondment within corporate group | Long-term appointment, direct hire, PR intent | High-volume intragroup or project-based movement of multiple workers |
For edge cases — including applicants who qualify for both ICT and Critical Skills categories or companies deciding between ICT and Corporate Visa — the sections below address the decision criteria directly.
The key differences that affect the decision are renewability and the permanent residence pathway. The General Work Visa is assessed under the points-based system introduced by Government Notice 5448 of 18 October 2024 — the former Department of Labour (DOL) certificate requirement no longer applies. The General Work Visa is renewable and counts toward the 5-year continuous work visa period required for permanent residence under Section 26(a) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. The ICT visa is not renewable and does not count toward that PR threshold. For any foreign national with long-term settlement intent, the General Work Visa is the structurally superior route.
The corporate visa is designed for employers who need to move a defined number of foreign workers into South Africa under a single company authorisation — rather than individual applications per employee. A corporate visa is issued to the employer entity, which then issues corporate worker certificates to individual employees. The ICT visa is an individual application. Where a company is transferring a single employee or a small number of employees on defined secondments, the ICT visa is the cleaner route. Where a company is managing a high volume of transfers on an ongoing basis, the corporate visa reduces administrative overhead per employee but requires the employer to maintain the corporate authorisation and comply with associated conditions.
An employee eligible for an ICT visa may also qualify for the Critical Skills Work Visa if their occupation appears on the published critical skills list. The reason to choose the Critical Skills route instead is access to a renewable visa, a direct permanent residence pathway under Section 27(b) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, and the ability to change employers without losing visa status. The Critical Skills Work Visa is not restricted to a single employer or role. For a foreign national whose occupation appears on the critical skills list and who has long-term settlement intent, the Critical Skills Work Visa is structurally stronger than the ICT visa – even where the ICT visa is technically available.
When the 4-year ICT period ends, the holder must leave South Africa. Time on an ICT visa does not count toward permanent residence under Section 26(a) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, which requires 5 years of continuous work visa status. Conversion and permanent residence planning must begin well before the 4-year limit. Starting this process at year 3 is the minimum; starting at year 2 is the correct approach.
The departure obligation is absolute. An ICT holder who remains in South Africa beyond their visa expiry date becomes an illegal foreigner under the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. Overstaying triggers a potential declaration of undesirability under Section 30(1)(h), with bans of 12 months to 5 years depending on the length of overstay.
The ICT holder must depart South Africa on or before the expiry date stamped on the visa. There is no grace period. In the final weeks of the visa period, the holder remains lawfully present and may continue working up to the expiry date. They may not overstay, even by a single day, without triggering enforcement consequences. Where a conversion or new visa application is in progress, the applicant should not assume their current status is protected — specialist advice on maintaining lawful status during any application period is essential.
ICT visa time does not count toward the 5-year continuous work visa period required for permanent residence under Section 26(a) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. Regulation 23(5) confirms that an applicant for PR under Section 26(a) must submit proof of a work visa “contemplated in Section 19 of the Act for a continuous period of five years”. While the ICT visa is issued under Section 19(5), DHA’s consistent practice is not to credit ICT time toward this PR category. PR planning for a former ICT holder must be structured around a different visa category that clearly accumulates qualifying time.
No — for the same reason that an ICT visa cannot be applied for in-country. DHA will not accept a change-of-status application from an ICT holder lodged inside South Africa. The correct route is to depart South Africa before or at expiry and apply for the new visa category from the applicant’s country of residence through VFS Global or the relevant DIRCO mission. An applicant who waits until the final days of their ICT visa to initiate a conversion will not have a new visa in time. Conversion planning must begin at least 12 months before expiry to allow for employer documentation and VFS lodgement.
The most structured PR pathways available to a former ICT holder are:
The single most common error is waiting until the 4-year ICT term ends before starting PR planning. By that point, the applicant is departing South Africa with no qualifying time accumulated toward the most viable PR categories.
Yes, where the qualifying conditions are met. A foreign national on an ICT visa who is married to or in a life partnership with a South African citizen or permanent resident may apply for PR under Section 26(b) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, provided the relationship has subsisted for 5 years and the director-general is satisfied that a good faith relationship exists. The ICT visa status does not preclude a spousal visa PR application. However, DHA processing times for spousal PR applications are notoriously protracted — commonly 3 to 5 years from lodgement to decision. The application must be submitted well before the ICT visa expires to have any prospect of a decision before departure is required.
The ICT visa creates ongoing statutory obligations for the South African employer beyond the application stage. Non-compliance—through unauthorised role changes, failure to execute the skills transfer plan, or inability to cover deportation costs—can render the employee undocumented and expose the company to DHA enforcement action. These obligations exist under Regulations 18(9) and 18(11) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018) – they are not discretionary HR policy.
Ongoing Notification Obligations (Regulation 18(9)):
Enforcement Consequences:
Regulation 18(9)(b) requires the employer to “immediately notify the Director-General if the employee refuses to comply with the provisions of the Act or conditions of his or her visa”. This obligation extends to any material change in employment status. Where the employee’s role changes substantially, where they are seconded to a different entity within the corporate group, or where the employment relationship ends for any reason — resignation, retrenchment, dismissal, or mutual separation — the employer must notify the DHA. The mechanism is written communication to the director-general of the Department of Home Affairs (DHA). Delay in notification creates a gap period in which the employee may be considered undocumented.
Regulation 18(9)(c) requires that “a plan is developed for the transfer of skills to a South African citizen or permanent resident”. Failure to execute this plan — whether because the plan was superficial, no South African national was identified, or the employer never operationalised it — has both direct and indirect consequences. DHA may find that the employer’s undertaking was false if the skills transfer was never executed, which affects the employer’s standing in future immigration applications. Where the company seeks a corporate visa or Trusted Employer Scheme (TES) enrolment, a non-executed skills transfer record creates a compliance obstacle.
Regulation 18(11) places the deportation cost obligation squarely on the South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate that confirmed the transfer. If DHA deports the ICT holder and the employer fails to reimburse the costs, DHA may pursue recovery through civil proceedings against the entity. The deportation undertaking signed by the employer at the application stage is a legally binding commitment — not a formality. An employer in financial difficulty who cannot meet this obligation may find that DHA withholds future visa approvals for that entity until the debt is resolved.
An ICT visa application submitted from inside South Africa will be rejected or not accepted at lodgement. The employer who arranged or acquiesced to an in-country application carries a compliance risk. If the visa was somehow processed and later found to have been lodged domestically, it may be subject to cancellation on the basis of procedural irregularity. The correct position is to require the employee to depart South Africa and apply through VFS Global or the relevant DIRCO mission before any application is submitted.
Business rescue or liquidation of the South African entity has immediate implications for the ICT visa. The employer’s notification obligations under Regulation 18(9)(b) remain active even during business rescue proceedings. Where the entity is liquidated, the deportation undertaking under Regulation 18(11) becomes a claim against the liquidated estate, with DHA as a creditor. The ICT holder whose employer enters liquidation faces loss of their employment basis, which may render the visa conditions unsatisfied. Immediate specialist immigration advice is required: the holder may need to depart South Africa, apply for a different visa category from abroad, or identify whether any restructured entity in the corporate group can assume the employer obligations.
The Trusted Employer Scheme (TES) is a points-based streamlining mechanism introduced under Government Notice 5448, published 18 October 2024 (GG 51416), under Section 19 read with Regulations 18(12) and (13) of the Immigration Regulations. TES recognises an applicant for up to 30 additional points under the points-based system, directly affecting General Work Visa and Critical Skills Work Visa processing. The practical intersection with ICT visa applications: a company already compliant with Regulation 18(9)(c) — the skills transfer plan — holds one of the core inputs that TES eligibility requires. An employer running multiple intragroup ICT transfers who invests in a structured skills transfer programme is simultaneously building TES eligibility. Companies should assess their points under the GN 5448 criteria, confirm compliance with all employer undertaking obligations required by Regulation 18(9), and engage an accredited immigration practitioner regarding the enrolment process.
The ICT visa has hard limits and strict employer obligations. If you are being transferred to South Africa or managing an intragroup transfer, planning starts before the visa application — not after arrival.
If you are preparing an ICT visa application or planning the transition after 4 years, book a consultation with Migrate With Q. We assess your eligibility, your employer’s compliance position, and your post-ICT pathway before you apply.
The Intra-Company Transfer Work Visa (ICT visa) is a temporary work authorisation issued under Section 19(5) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. It allows a foreign national employed by a company abroad to be transferred to a South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate of that company for up to 4 years. It is not a route for new hires or direct appointments — the applicant must already hold an employment contract with the foreign entity.
A foreign national qualifies if they hold a contract of employment with the company abroad valid for not less than 6 months, are being transferred to a South African branch, subsidiary, or affiliate of that company, and will be employed in the same or a related role. Directors without an employment contract, freelance contractors, and new hires do not qualify. The corporate relationship between the foreign entity and the South African entity must be demonstrable through CIPC registration and supporting documentation.
No. Regulation 18(10) states that the ICT visa “is not renewable”. DHA does not offer an extension or renewal mechanism for this category. When the visa period ends, the holder must depart South Africa and apply for a different visa category from abroad if they wish to continue working in South Africa.
No. Applications submitted from inside South Africa will not be accepted. The correct lodgement route is outside South Africa — through a VFS Global centre or DIRCO mission in your country of residence. A foreign national already onshore who needs an ICT visa must depart South Africa and apply from abroad.
No, under the standard interpretation applied by DHA. Section 26(a) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 requires 5 continuous years on a qualifying work visa under Section 19, with a confirmed offer of permanent employment. DHA’s practice is not to credit ICT visa time toward this threshold. PR planning for ICT holders must be built around a separate qualifying visa category.
Yes. Family members may accompany an ICT visa holder by applying for an accompanying dependant’s visa. They must apply separately, demonstrating the qualifying family relationship and financial dependency. The accompanying dependant visa is issued for a period tied to the principal visa holder’s status. Dependent visas do not grant work or study rights — those require separate applications, like a study visa, for example.
No. The accompanying dependant visa does not confer the right to work. A spouse or dependant wishing to be employed in South Africa must apply for their own work visa independently – either a general work visa (assessed under the points-based system) or a critical skills work visa. This requires a separate application process and cannot be added to the dependant visa after arrival.
DHA does not publish a guaranteed processing timeframe. In practice, applications lodged at VFS Global centres take 8 to 16 weeks from submission to decision as a working range. Complex applications or those with documentation queries take longer. Do not commit to a South African start date until the visa is physically in your passport.
The skills transfer plan is a mandatory document required under Regulation 18(9)(c) of the Immigration Regulations (2014, updated 2018). It must describe the plan for transferring skills to a South African citizen or permanent resident during the visa period. The South African employer prepares it. DHA expects the plan to name the intended beneficiary, describe the skills to be transferred, and include a timeline. A vague letter of intent does not satisfy the requirement.
No. The ICT visa is issued to a specific individual for a specific position with a specific employer entity. It cannot be transferred to a different employer or a different position. Where a role change or employer change occurs, the existing visa conditions may be breached. A new visa application in the correct category must be submitted from outside South Africa.
The most viable routes are the Critical Skills PR under Section 27(b) — where the applicant’s occupation appears on the published critical skills list and they hold 5 years of post-qualification experience — or the Section 26(b) spousal PR, where the applicant is married to or in a qualifying life partnership with a South African citizen or permanent resident for 5 years. Section 26(a) work visa PR is available but requires the applicant to first accumulate 5 continuous years on a non-ICT work visa. Planning must start at ICT year 1 or 2 — not year 4.
The Trusted Employer Scheme (TES), introduced under GN 5448 of 18 October 2024, primarily affects General Work Visa and Critical Skills Work Visa processing by awarding points to applicants with offers from TES-enrolled employers. It does not directly streamline the ICT visa process, which operates under a separate regulatory mechanism. However, companies already compliant with the ICT skills transfer plan requirement under Regulation 18(9)(c) hold a key TES eligibility input. Employers managing multiple ICT transfers who invest in TES enrolment can improve processing outcomes for subsequent general work visa or critical skills applications — the two most common post-ICT pathways for foreign nationals choosing to remain in South Africa long-term.
Contact
8 Chepstowe Street
Tijgerhof, Cape Town
Mon–Fri: 8:00 am to 4:00 pm
© All Copyright 2026 by Migrate With Q
Migrate With Q provides immigration consulting and application support services. All immigration decisions are made by the Department of Home Affairs. Please note: Official DHA application forms and basic procedural guides are available at no cost directly from the Department of Home Affairs.
We are a registered business - 2021/773235/07 (PTY LTD)